|
INNOVATIONS
IN TRAVEL MODELING 2008
PORTLAND,
OREGON
JUNE
22 - JUNE 24
Jointly
sponsored by the Transportation Research Board, Federal Highway
Administration, Federal Transit Administration, Oregon Department
of Transportation, Portland Metro, and Portland State University.
This
conference built on the highly successful ITM06 conference in Austin,
examining innovative and promising advances in travel modeling,
with an emphasis on moving state-of-the-art research into practice.
The
program can be found here.
The conference included sessions addressing the following themes:
|
|
ACTIVITY-BASED
MODELING TUTORIAL
|
|
|
Activity-Based
Models
|
Jen
Malm, DRCOG
|
|
Why
Make the Changes? What are the Benefits?
|
Chuck
Purvis, MTC
|
|
Transitioning:
Trip-based to Tour-based Models
|
Richard
Walker, Metro
|
|
How
Will ARC Make the Transition from its 4-Step Trip-Based
Model to Activity-Based Modeling?
|
Guy
Roussseau, ARC
|
|
Comparing
4-Step and Activity-Based Models
|
Billy
Charlton, SFCTA
|
|
What
Do Comparisons of 4-Step and ABTMModelsTell Us?: Examples
from Sacramento
|
Gordon
Garry, SACOG
|
|
Taking
Models Out of the Box: Prospects for expanding the scope
of travel demand microsimulation
|
Mark
Bradley
|
|
CLIMATE
CHANGE & TRAVEL MODELING TUTORIAL
|
|
|
An Introduction to Climate Modeling,
or tell me again How do urban travel models fit in?
How do urban travel models fit in?
|
Deb
Niemeier, UC Davis
|
|
Introduction
to EPA’s MOVES Model
|
Jeff
Houk, FHWA Resource Center
|
|
Application
of MOVES to Travel Demand Models
|
Balaji
Yelchuru, AECOM Consult
|
|
Adapting
Travel Models and Urban Models to Forecast Greenhouse
Gases in California
|
Robert
A. Johnston, Mike McCoy, Nathaniel Roth, UC Davis
|
|
Travel
Model Improvements For Climate Change
|
Maren
Outwater, Kelly McGourty, and Larry Blain, PSRC
|
|
PLENARY
SESSION
|
|
|
So
much to do-so little done? So much to do-so little time?
|
Keith
Lawton
|
|
COMMUNICATING
FORECASTS 1
|
|
|
Communicating
Simulation Results
|
David
Roden, AECOM Consult
|
|
The
Expression of Travel Model Information: Gauging
Presentations and Exhibits to Audiences
|
Christopher
Primus,
Jacobs Carter Burgess Inc.
|
|
Communicating
Complex Models: A Few of the Lessons Learned from the
California Statewide Model for High-Speed Rail
|
Elizabeth
Sall, SFCTA
|
|
Communicating
Forecasts in the Transit New Starts Process
|
Ken
Cervenka, FTA
|
|
PRICING
AND POLICY 1
|
|
|
Travel
Demand Modeling Needs for Road Pricing Challenges and
Opportunities
|
Jeff
Buxbaum, Cambridge Systematics
|
|
Modeling
Manhattan Area Congestion Pricing within the Framework
of an Activity--Based Model Model
|
Robert
Donnelly, PB
|
|
Modeling
Response to Congestion Pricing in Tel Aviv: A Tour-Based
Approach
|
Yoram
Shiftan and Issa Zananiri, Technion, Israel Institute
of Technology
|
|
ACTIVITY-BASED
MODELS 1
|
|
|
From
Longitudinal Data to Microsimulation: the mobiTopp
Concept
|
Tobias
Kuhnimhof, IfV, Universität Karlsruhe
|
|
Switzerland
in a box: An agent-based model of travel demand and
traffic flow
|
KW
Axhausen and M Balmer,
IVT, ETH Zurich
|
|
“Westumfahrung
Zurich”: Real World Study with MATSimy
|
Michael
Balmer, IVT, ETH Zurich
|
|
Agent-based
simulation of travel demand: A technology with high
potential for business decisions
|
Roman
Oberli, Mappuls, AG
|
|
PRICING
AND POLICY 2
|
|
|
Using
Toll Revenue Forecasts for Highway Investment Decisions
|
Cherian
George, Fitch Ratings
|
|
The
Toll Revenue ForecastingChallenge: Advances & Lessons
Learned from The Port Authority of New York and New
Jersey
|
Mark
Muriello, PANYNJ
|
|
Using
Toll Revenue Forecasts for Highway Investment Decisions
|
Winnie
Shi, KPMG
|
|
ACTIVITY-BASED
MODELS 2
|
|
|
Part
I: Albatross:overview of the model ongoing work and
research agenda
|
Harry
Timmermans,
Eindhoven University of Technology
|
|
Part
II Albatross: applications and experiences
|
Theo
Arentze,
Eindhoven University of Technology
|
|
CEMDAP:
A Second Generation Activity-Based Travel Modeling System
for Metropolitan AreasMetropolitan Areas
|
Chandra
Bhat and Travis Waller,
UT Austin
|
|
Road
to ABM at NCTCOG
|
Arash
Mirzaei, NCTCOG
|
|
LINKING
DYNAMIC NETWORK &
TRAVEL MODELS 1
|
|
|
Integrating
Activity-Travel Decisions in Dynamic Network Micro-Assignment
Models
|
Hani
Mahmassani,
Northwestern University
|
|
Modeling
and Simulation of a Morning Reaction to an Evening Toll
|
Marcel
Rieser, TU Berlin
|
|
Applications
of Dynamic Traffic Assignment in Twin Cities Area
|
Steve
Wilson, SRF Consulting
|
|
LINKING
DYNAMIC NETWORK &
TRAVEL MODELS 2
|
|
|
Dynamic
Choices in Coordinated Household Activity-Travel Systems
|
John
Gliebe, Portland State University
|
|
Linking
activity-based travel demand models and traffic assignment:
A Flemish case study
|
Katrien
Ramaekers, Tom Bellemans, Hasselt University
|
|
Integrating
an Activity Based Model with a DTA model – the TRANSIMS
Portland Application
|
Hayssam
Sbayti, AECOM Consult
|
|
COMMUNICATING
FORECASTS 2
|
|
|
Gone
in Sixty Seconds: Communicating Benefits to Survey Respondents
|
Stacey
Bricka, NuStats
|
|
Guiding
Scenario Exploration Through Forecast Model Interface
Design
|
Catherine
Emond, UC Davis
|
|
Wiki
Software for Intra-Agency Communication and Data Management
|
Christopher
M. Puchalsky, Ph.D.
|
|
ACTIVITY-BASED
MODELS 3
|
|
|
TASHA:
An activity based model with an application in emissions
|
Matthew
J. Roorda,
University of Toronto
|
|
Integrated,
Dynamic Activity-Network Simulator: Current State and
Future Directions of PCATS-DEBNetS
|
Ryuichi
Kitamuray,
Kyoto University
|
|
The
Day Activity Schedule Approach of Bowman, Ben-Akiva
and Bradley: 1994-2008
|
John
L Bowman
|
|
TRESIS:
An Integrated Land Use-Transport-Environment Model from
Australia
|
Peter
Stopher,
Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies,
The University of Sydney
|
|
PRICING
AND POLICY 3
|
|
|
Towards
a Post-Processor-Based HOT Lane Mode Shift Model
|
Laura
B. McWethy,
Cambridge Systematics
|
|
Modeling
a Road Pricing Experiment
|
Larry
Blain, PSRC
|
|
Enhancement
and Application of an Activity-Based Travel Model for
Congestion Pricing
|
Greg
Erhardt, PB
|
|
|
|
